https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313785 Retrospective substitution of rule 200 was upheld because the amended statutory scheme expressly authorised retrospective rule-making, including service conditions of co-operative society employees; the amended rule validly applied to employees in service and withdrew the earlier saving as to retirement age. The challenge that the new rule impermissibly reversed an earlier judicial interpretation also failed, because a prior construction of the unamended rule does not bar later amendment where the rule-making authority is lawfully empowered to change the legal basis. The earlier decision had only interpreted the prior rule and did not create an enforceable mandamus or binding inter partes relief. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2024 11:39:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313785 Retrospective substitution of rule 200 was upheld because the amended statutory scheme expressly authorised retrospective rule-making, including service conditions of co-operative society employees; the amended rule validly applied to employees in service and withdrew the earlier saving as to retirement age. The challenge that the new rule impermissibly reversed an earlier judicial interpretation also failed, because a prior construction of the unamended rule does not bar later amendment where the rule-making authority is lawfully empowered to change the legal basis. The earlier decision had only interpreted the prior rule and did not create an enforceable mandamus or binding inter partes relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313785