<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752060</link>
    <description>HC allowed partial relief in tax dispute. Petitioner challenged tax order dated 09.11.2023, raising concerns about tax imposition and Input Tax Credit. Court set aside original order, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand and requiring respondent to reconsider tax calculation within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 113 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752060</link>
      <description>HC allowed partial relief in tax dispute. Petitioner challenged tax order dated 09.11.2023, raising concerns about tax imposition and Input Tax Credit. Court set aside original order, directing petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand and requiring respondent to reconsider tax calculation within three months, ensuring principles of natural justice are followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>