<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 97 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752044</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80P depends on whether a co-operative society satisfies the statutory test of a co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, read with its bye-laws and the governing co-operative law. Mere classification as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society does not by itself settle eligibility where the bye-laws permit banking activity with members and non-members. Because the bye-laws were not available in usable form, factual verification was required before deciding whether section 80P(4) applied and what deduction, if any, remained available. The matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration on the assessee&#039;s eligibility and the extent of deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 97 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752044</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80P depends on whether a co-operative society satisfies the statutory test of a co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, read with its bye-laws and the governing co-operative law. Mere classification as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society does not by itself settle eligibility where the bye-laws permit banking activity with members and non-members. Because the bye-laws were not available in usable form, factual verification was required before deciding whether section 80P(4) applied and what deduction, if any, remained available. The matter was therefore remitted for reconsideration on the assessee&#039;s eligibility and the extent of deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>