<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 85 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36622</link>
    <description>The court held that the receipt of Rs. 1,87,870 by the assessee firm constituted taxable income arising from business activities rather than a windfall. The amount, received due to a contractual agreement following currency devaluation, was found to be a legitimate part of the business transaction with a Russian party for the sale of pepper. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the sum was a trading receipt and taxable as income derived in the course of business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 85 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36622</link>
      <description>The court held that the receipt of Rs. 1,87,870 by the assessee firm constituted taxable income arising from business activities rather than a windfall. The amount, received due to a contractual agreement following currency devaluation, was found to be a legitimate part of the business transaction with a Russian party for the sale of pepper. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the sum was a trading receipt and taxable as income derived in the course of business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>