<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Clears Director of Penalty in Gutka Case, Upholds Penalties for Truck Drivers Lacking Proper Documentation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77039</link>
    <description>Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The Tribunal found that the appellant was indeed a &quot;dummy director&quot; with no active role in the company&#039;s operations. Considering his resignation well before the period of dispute and the lack of evidence implicating him in the evasion of duty, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on him. - However regarding the penalty on Drivers: the Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the transporters despite their arguments. It noted that even though some of the transporters were semi-literate, they were aware of the requirement to carry proper documentation for transporting goods. Therefore, the penalties imposed on them were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:21:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:21:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Clears Director of Penalty in Gutka Case, Upholds Penalties for Truck Drivers Lacking Proper Documentation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77039</link>
      <description>Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The Tribunal found that the appellant was indeed a &quot;dummy director&quot; with no active role in the company&#039;s operations. Considering his resignation well before the period of dispute and the lack of evidence implicating him in the evasion of duty, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on him. - However regarding the penalty on Drivers: the Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the transporters despite their arguments. It noted that even though some of the transporters were semi-literate, they were aware of the requirement to carry proper documentation for transporting goods. Therefore, the penalties imposed on them were upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:21:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>