https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752006 The SC set aside the HC's order permitting respondents to construct a compound wall under police protection. The HC failed to conduct elementary enquiry regarding third parties' rights despite senior district officials stating on oath that construction would affect several third parties' rights. The court ignored sworn statements and failed to direct impleadment of affected parties, whose names were available in the Minutes of Order. The SC held the HC order illegal for not following proper procedure and remanded the matter to HC for fresh consideration according to law. Appeal allowed in part. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2024 08:21:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752006 The SC set aside the HC's order permitting respondents to construct a compound wall under police protection. The HC failed to conduct elementary enquiry regarding third parties' rights despite senior district officials stating on oath that construction would affect several third parties' rights. The court ignored sworn statements and failed to direct impleadment of affected parties, whose names were available in the Minutes of Order. The SC held the HC order illegal for not following proper procedure and remanded the matter to HC for fresh consideration according to law. Appeal allowed in part. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752006