<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752005</link>
    <description>Ex parte interim injunctions in defamation suits affecting journalistic speech require a reasoned application of the prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury tests, with heightened caution against prior restraint. The court must also consider whether the publication is alleged to be malicious or palpably false, and whether urgent refusal would cause greater injustice. An order that merely recites conclusions without analysing the factual basis or necessity for restraint is an unreasoned curb on speech and cannot stand. The impugned injunctive orders were set aside and the injunction request was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 58 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752005</link>
      <description>Ex parte interim injunctions in defamation suits affecting journalistic speech require a reasoned application of the prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury tests, with heightened caution against prior restraint. The court must also consider whether the publication is alleged to be malicious or palpably false, and whether urgent refusal would cause greater injustice. An order that merely recites conclusions without analysing the factual basis or necessity for restraint is an unreasoned curb on speech and cannot stand. The impugned injunctive orders were set aside and the injunction request was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>