<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1595 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313768</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC dismissed petition in eviction suit involving landlord identity dispute. Petitioner previously claimed Mohammad Shafi was his landlord but later denied this in subsequent litigation. Court applied judicial estoppel doctrine, ruling petitioner cannot take contradictory positions in different proceedings to maintain court integrity. Since rent was paid to Shafi, he was deemed landlord under applicable Act. Court found no illegality in lower court order and dismissed petition, preventing petitioner from changing his stance regarding landlord identity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1595 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313768</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC dismissed petition in eviction suit involving landlord identity dispute. Petitioner previously claimed Mohammad Shafi was his landlord but later denied this in subsequent litigation. Court applied judicial estoppel doctrine, ruling petitioner cannot take contradictory positions in different proceedings to maintain court integrity. Since rent was paid to Shafi, he was deemed landlord under applicable Act. Court found no illegality in lower court order and dismissed petition, preventing petitioner from changing his stance regarding landlord identity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>