<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313771</link>
    <description>Acquittal for criminal breach of trust and forgery was upheld because the prosecution failed to prove conversion of entrusted property or misappropriation of sale proceeds. The Daily Collection Reports and computer-generated printouts were not properly proved, as the original hard disk was not seized and the copies did not meet the required evidentiary standard. Dishonour of some cheques received by the oil company did not, by itself, establish criminal breach of trust or forgery. The trial court&#039;s view was a possible one, and no substantial or compelling reason existed to disturb the acquittal, which reinforced the presumption of innocence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1320 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313771</link>
      <description>Acquittal for criminal breach of trust and forgery was upheld because the prosecution failed to prove conversion of entrusted property or misappropriation of sale proceeds. The Daily Collection Reports and computer-generated printouts were not properly proved, as the original hard disk was not seized and the copies did not meet the required evidentiary standard. Dishonour of some cheques received by the oil company did not, by itself, establish criminal breach of trust or forgery. The trial court&#039;s view was a possible one, and no substantial or compelling reason existed to disturb the acquittal, which reinforced the presumption of innocence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>