https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313772 The Calcutta HC rejected a petition seeking ad interim injunction against assets of a deceased person in probate proceedings. Despite challenges to signature authenticity in documents, the court found insufficient evidence of fraud or forgery under Order VI Rule 4 CPC. The court noted that while probate courts can adjudicate prima facie rights for administrator appointment or injunctive relief, no change in circumstances was established to reconsider previous coordinate bench orders. The petition for additional reliefs beyond injunction was denied. Respondents were directed to file opposition affidavits, with replies due by January 14, 2022, and matter listed for final hearing. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313772 The Calcutta HC rejected a petition seeking ad interim injunction against assets of a deceased person in probate proceedings. Despite challenges to signature authenticity in documents, the court found insufficient evidence of fraud or forgery under Order VI Rule 4 CPC. The court noted that while probate courts can adjudicate prima facie rights for administrator appointment or injunctive relief, no change in circumstances was established to reconsider previous coordinate bench orders. The petition for additional reliefs beyond injunction was denied. Respondents were directed to file opposition affidavits, with replies due by January 14, 2022, and matter listed for final hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313772