<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1386 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313775</link>
    <description>ITAT Jodhpur held that late fees under section 234E cannot be levied for delay in filing quarterly TDS returns prior to 01.06.2015, as this provision came into effect from that date and is prospective in nature. The tribunal ruled that intimations under section 200A for FY 2012-13 seeking late fees were not supported by law, following precedent from Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank case. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, confirming that the demand was not in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1386 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313775</link>
      <description>ITAT Jodhpur held that late fees under section 234E cannot be levied for delay in filing quarterly TDS returns prior to 01.06.2015, as this provision came into effect from that date and is prospective in nature. The tribunal ruled that intimations under section 200A for FY 2012-13 seeking late fees were not supported by law, following precedent from Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank case. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, confirming that the demand was not in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>