<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752001</link>
    <description>Section 80P deduction depends on whether the assessee falls within the co-operative bank exclusion in section 80P(4). The Tribunal noted that the assessee&#039;s lending and deposit-taking activities indicated banking activity, and that the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 definitions of co-operative bank and primary co-operative bank govern the exclusion. It also found that the plea based on the bye-laws permitting admission of other co-operative societies as members had not been properly adjudicated and the bye-laws were not reliably on record. The matter was therefore restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination of the assessee&#039;s status under the Banking Regulation Act and its entitlement to deduction under section 80P(1) read with section 80P(2)(a)(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 19:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 54 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752001</link>
      <description>Section 80P deduction depends on whether the assessee falls within the co-operative bank exclusion in section 80P(4). The Tribunal noted that the assessee&#039;s lending and deposit-taking activities indicated banking activity, and that the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 definitions of co-operative bank and primary co-operative bank govern the exclusion. It also found that the plea based on the bye-laws permitting admission of other co-operative societies as members had not been properly adjudicated and the bye-laws were not reliably on record. The matter was therefore restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination of the assessee&#039;s status under the Banking Regulation Act and its entitlement to deduction under section 80P(1) read with section 80P(2)(a)(i).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>