https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313765 The HC quashed the impugned order, ruling that the JM at Aurangabad lacked jurisdiction over the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court emphasized that the failure to make payment occurred in Nagpur, where the transaction and dishonor of cheques took place. The complainant was allowed to file the complaint in Nagpur within 30 days, underscoring the importance of jurisdiction based on the location of key events. The issuance of a demand notice from Aurangabad did not confer jurisdiction, as the cause of action arose in Nagpur. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2024 18:09:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313765 The HC quashed the impugned order, ruling that the JM at Aurangabad lacked jurisdiction over the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court emphasized that the failure to make payment occurred in Nagpur, where the transaction and dishonor of cheques took place. The complainant was allowed to file the complaint in Nagpur within 30 days, underscoring the importance of jurisdiction based on the location of key events. The issuance of a demand notice from Aurangabad did not confer jurisdiction, as the cause of action arose in Nagpur. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313765