https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763 The HC dismissed the appellant's Interlocutory Application for a stay of the conviction order, finding no grounds to warrant such relief during the appeal. The Court upheld the initiation of departmental proceedings post-conviction, as the charges in the departmental enquiry were distinct from previous ones, negating claims of double punishment. The appellant remains convicted under Sections 409/477A IPC and Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending appeal. The judgment underscores the principles regarding stay applications, departmental actions post-conviction, and the prohibition of double jeopardy. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2024 17:45:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763 The HC dismissed the appellant's Interlocutory Application for a stay of the conviction order, finding no grounds to warrant such relief during the appeal. The Court upheld the initiation of departmental proceedings post-conviction, as the charges in the departmental enquiry were distinct from previous ones, negating claims of double punishment. The appellant remains convicted under Sections 409/477A IPC and Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending appeal. The judgment underscores the principles regarding stay applications, departmental actions post-conviction, and the prohibition of double jeopardy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763