<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 721 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763</link>
    <description>Suspension of a corruption conviction under Section 389(1) CrPC is an exceptional remedy, available only in very limited circumstances. The court treated the conviction as arising from judicial adjudication on graft charges and held that a public servant convicted for corruption should ordinarily continue to suffer the legal disability of conviction until exoneration by a superior court. It also distinguished the cited precedents on their facts and found that earlier departmental proceedings and the later criminal conviction concerned distinct charges. On that basis, the request to stay or suspend the conviction was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 17:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 721 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763</link>
      <description>Suspension of a corruption conviction under Section 389(1) CrPC is an exceptional remedy, available only in very limited circumstances. The court treated the conviction as arising from judicial adjudication on graft charges and held that a public servant convicted for corruption should ordinarily continue to suffer the legal disability of conviction until exoneration by a superior court. It also distinguished the cited precedents on their facts and found that earlier departmental proceedings and the later criminal conviction concerned distinct charges. On that basis, the request to stay or suspend the conviction was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>