<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313762</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that the sale of hotel premises, post-closure, as small plots constituted capital income, not business income. The Court emphasized the Firm&#039;s primary business was hotel operation, not property development, highlighting intent and primary business activities in income classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 17:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313762</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision that the sale of hotel premises, post-closure, as small plots constituted capital income, not business income. The Court emphasized the Firm&#039;s primary business was hotel operation, not property development, highlighting intent and primary business activities in income classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>