<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313761</link>
    <description>The Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1982 was enacted to cure the defect caused by non-publication of the relevant notifications by deeming those notifications valid and effective and by protecting market fees levied, collected, or to be levied and collected despite that defect. The validating legislation did not formally annul the earlier High Court judgments, but it removed the legal basis on which they rested. Once that foundation disappeared, the statute operated retrospectively to sustain the notifications and the associated levies and collections, and the market fee demands were treated as valid under the validating law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313761</link>
      <description>The Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets (Validation) Act, 1982 was enacted to cure the defect caused by non-publication of the relevant notifications by deeming those notifications valid and effective and by protecting market fees levied, collected, or to be levied and collected despite that defect. The validating legislation did not formally annul the earlier High Court judgments, but it removed the legal basis on which they rested. Once that foundation disappeared, the statute operated retrospectively to sustain the notifications and the associated levies and collections, and the market fee demands were treated as valid under the validating law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>