<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313759</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the market levy and the requirement for licenses under the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Market Act. It found no violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, emphasizing a reasonable relationship between the levy and services rendered by the market committee. Costs were assessed at Rs. 10,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 15:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 529 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313759</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the market levy and the requirement for licenses under the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Market Act. It found no violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, emphasizing a reasonable relationship between the levy and services rendered by the market committee. Costs were assessed at Rs. 10,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>