https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313760 Circumstantial evidence established that the deceased died a homicidal death rather than by suicide. The alleged suicide note was not proved genuine, the medical and chemical evidence showed absence of poison, and the injuries were consistent with severe pressure or assault on the pancreatic and splenic region causing haemorrhage. The surrounding circumstances, including the strained marital relationship, the appellant's presence in the house, and the false explanation offered by the defence, formed a complete chain pointing to the appellant's responsibility. However, the evidence did not fully prove an intention to cause death, so the conviction was not altered to Section 302 IPC and the conviction under Section 304 Part II was upheld. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2024 15:37:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313760 Circumstantial evidence established that the deceased died a homicidal death rather than by suicide. The alleged suicide note was not proved genuine, the medical and chemical evidence showed absence of poison, and the injuries were consistent with severe pressure or assault on the pancreatic and splenic region causing haemorrhage. The surrounding circumstances, including the strained marital relationship, the appellant's presence in the house, and the false explanation offered by the defence, formed a complete chain pointing to the appellant's responsibility. However, the evidence did not fully prove an intention to cause death, so the conviction was not altered to Section 302 IPC and the conviction under Section 304 Part II was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313760