<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 878 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that payments made by NAFED to KSCMFL or procuring societies were not &quot;commission&quot; under section 194H, as they were principal-to-principal transactions. Consequently, NAFED was not required to deduct tax at source, could not be deemed an assessee in default under section 201(1), and interest under section 201(1A) was not applicable. The Tribunal annulled the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 878 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that payments made by NAFED to KSCMFL or procuring societies were not &quot;commission&quot; under section 194H, as they were principal-to-principal transactions. Consequently, NAFED was not required to deduct tax at source, could not be deemed an assessee in default under section 201(1), and interest under section 201(1A) was not applicable. The Tribunal annulled the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>