<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313749</link>
    <description>The HC determined that the Probate prepared by the Registry was incorrect, as it improperly included property details in Annexures &#039;A&#039; and &#039;B&#039; and an affidavit of valuation, contrary to the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court ordered the removal of these documents from the Probate, emphasizing adherence to Sections 317 and 318 for estate administration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 11:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313749</link>
      <description>The HC determined that the Probate prepared by the Registry was incorrect, as it improperly included property details in Annexures &#039;A&#039; and &#039;B&#039; and an affidavit of valuation, contrary to the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court ordered the removal of these documents from the Probate, emphasizing adherence to Sections 317 and 318 for estate administration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>