https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748 The appellate Court upheld the lower Court's decision, denying the executrix's applications for additional assets not listed in the probate schedule. The Court emphasized the executor's duty to manage the estate per the will, rejected claims of Court error under Section 151 CPC, and reinforced the principle of res judicata, affirming previous judgments' binding nature. Disputes over assets outside the probate schedule were deemed appropriate for resolution in a civil Court, not within probate proceedings. The judgment clarified the executor's responsibilities, the Court's jurisdiction, and the necessity for precise asset valuation under the Court-fees Act. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2024 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748 The appellate Court upheld the lower Court's decision, denying the executrix's applications for additional assets not listed in the probate schedule. The Court emphasized the executor's duty to manage the estate per the will, rejected claims of Court error under Section 151 CPC, and reinforced the principle of res judicata, affirming previous judgments' binding nature. Disputes over assets outside the probate schedule were deemed appropriate for resolution in a civil Court, not within probate proceedings. The judgment clarified the executor's responsibilities, the Court's jurisdiction, and the necessity for precise asset valuation under the Court-fees Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748