<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 95 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748</link>
    <description>Probate granted under section 289 of the Indian Succession Act is directed to administration of the estate, and the prescribed probate form does not make the annexed schedules of assets and liabilities part of the grant itself. The statement of assets is required for seeking probate under section 276, but the schedules remain separate from the operative probate order, a view reinforced by the court-fees scheme, which separately addresses valuation and later discovery of a different value. Because a litigant should not suffer for a court-made mistake, the erroneous annexation of the schedules could be corrected and the schedules were liable to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 95 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748</link>
      <description>Probate granted under section 289 of the Indian Succession Act is directed to administration of the estate, and the prescribed probate form does not make the annexed schedules of assets and liabilities part of the grant itself. The statement of assets is required for seeking probate under section 276, but the schedules remain separate from the operative probate order, a view reinforced by the court-fees scheme, which separately addresses valuation and later discovery of a different value. Because a litigant should not suffer for a court-made mistake, the erroneous annexation of the schedules could be corrected and the schedules were liable to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>