https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313747 The HC granted the plaintiff's Chamber Summons, allowing amendments to the suit to include additional respondents and challenge property alienations. The court affirmed its jurisdiction to address ancillary questions in an administration suit, such as the validity of transactions allegedly obtained by fraud. Amendments were to be completed by 12.6.2006, with a stay on the order's operation until 5.5.2006. The court did not assess the merits of the case, focusing solely on procedural matters. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2024 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313747 The HC granted the plaintiff's Chamber Summons, allowing amendments to the suit to include additional respondents and challenge property alienations. The court affirmed its jurisdiction to address ancillary questions in an administration suit, such as the validity of transactions allegedly obtained by fraud. Amendments were to be completed by 12.6.2006, with a stay on the order's operation until 5.5.2006. The court did not assess the merits of the case, focusing solely on procedural matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313747