<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1905 (7) TMI 3 - THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313745</link>
    <description>The HC of Calcutta affirmed its jurisdiction in the estate administration case, setting aside fraudulent instruments and granting administration to the purdanashin lady. It ordered an inquiry into pooja expenses for reasonable compensation and clarified the widow&#039;s entitlement to the estate&#039;s residue. The judgment favored the respondents, directing the appellants to cover the costs incurred by the lady defending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 1905 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1905 (7) TMI 3 - THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313745</link>
      <description>The HC of Calcutta affirmed its jurisdiction in the estate administration case, setting aside fraudulent instruments and granting administration to the purdanashin lady. It ordered an inquiry into pooja expenses for reasonable compensation and clarified the widow&#039;s entitlement to the estate&#039;s residue. The judgment favored the respondents, directing the appellants to cover the costs incurred by the lady defending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 1905 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>