https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751981 The HC set aside the impugned order requiring the petitioner to deposit 20% of the disputed tax demand pending appeal, citing a failure to consider the petitioner's prima facie case and financial constraints. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to submit additional documents within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and related motions were closed. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 May 2024 08:42:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751981 The HC set aside the impugned order requiring the petitioner to deposit 20% of the disputed tax demand pending appeal, citing a failure to consider the petitioner's prima facie case and financial constraints. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to submit additional documents within two weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and related motions were closed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751981