<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751979</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The AO&#039;s disallowance under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Act was deemed unsustainable, as the explanation for cash deposits during demonetization was not rejected legally. The decision reinforced the necessity of a reasonable explanation for cash transactions, drawing on relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 32 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751979</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the assessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The AO&#039;s disallowance under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Act was deemed unsustainable, as the explanation for cash deposits during demonetization was not rejected legally. The decision reinforced the necessity of a reasonable explanation for cash transactions, drawing on relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>