<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751969</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that the procedural non-compliance under section 138B rendered the statements and CRCL test report inadmissible, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. Consequently, the appellants, including the anonymized parties, were favored, nullifying penalties and confiscation orders previously imposed by the Commissioner of Customs, ICD, Tughlakabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 07:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751969</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that the procedural non-compliance under section 138B rendered the statements and CRCL test report inadmissible, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order. Consequently, the appellants, including the anonymized parties, were favored, nullifying penalties and confiscation orders previously imposed by the Commissioner of Customs, ICD, Tughlakabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>