<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Investment Trading Not a Service; Tax Demand on Investment Income Overturned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76996</link>
    <description>Reversal of CENVAT credit - Investment in shares - Exempt service or not - The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the appellant&#039;s argument that investment activities do not constitute a service. They emphasized that trading in securities does not qualify as a service, let alone an exempted service. Therefore, the demand for tax on investment income was deemed erroneous, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 07:57:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 07:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Investment Trading Not a Service; Tax Demand on Investment Income Overturned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76996</link>
      <description>Reversal of CENVAT credit - Investment in shares - Exempt service or not - The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the appellant&#039;s argument that investment activities do not constitute a service. They emphasized that trading in securities does not qualify as a service, let alone an exempted service. Therefore, the demand for tax on investment income was deemed erroneous, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 07:57:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>