<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1127 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751946</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a tax appeal where procedural requirements were initially not met. The petitioner failed to file a certified copy within the specified timeframe, causing appeal rejection. HC directed the tax authority to verify submitted documents and rehear the appeal, quashing the original order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing procedural compliance with substantive document review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1127 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751946</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a tax appeal where procedural requirements were initially not met. The petitioner failed to file a certified copy within the specified timeframe, causing appeal rejection. HC directed the tax authority to verify submitted documents and rehear the appeal, quashing the original order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing procedural compliance with substantive document review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>