https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736 Review jurisdiction is confined to patent error on the face of the record and cannot be used as a rehearing on merits or to introduce new documents or factual pleas not raised earlier without due diligence. Applying that standard, the court rejected reliance on alleged new material to reopen the concluded findings. It also held that where the deceased government servant's second marriage took place only after the death of the first , the marriage could not be treated as void on that basis, and the respondent could not be denied compassionate appointment merely as a child of that marriage. The review application therefore failed, and the earlier relief remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:26:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736 Review jurisdiction is confined to patent error on the face of the record and cannot be used as a rehearing on merits or to introduce new documents or factual pleas not raised earlier without due diligence. Applying that standard, the court rejected reliance on alleged new material to reopen the concluded findings. It also held that where the deceased government servant's second marriage took place only after the death of the first , the marriage could not be treated as void on that basis, and the respondent could not be denied compassionate appointment merely as a child of that marriage. The review application therefore failed, and the earlier relief remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736