<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2026 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a review application challenging a compassionate appointment order. The court held that new issues including a police statement and petition by the deceased&#039;s brother could not be raised in review proceedings as they were not presented before the single judge or appellate court during original proceedings. The court noted no rival claim existed from the first wife who died without issue. Review applicants cannot improve their case by introducing fresh evidence not part of original proceedings. The court suggested filing special leave petition before SC as proper remedy against the impugned judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2026 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a review application challenging a compassionate appointment order. The court held that new issues including a police statement and petition by the deceased&#039;s brother could not be raised in review proceedings as they were not presented before the single judge or appellate court during original proceedings. The court noted no rival claim existed from the first wife who died without issue. Review applicants cannot improve their case by introducing fresh evidence not part of original proceedings. The court suggested filing special leave petition before SC as proper remedy against the impugned judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>