<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1728 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313737</link>
    <description>A disapproval order under Section 10A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 must rest on a fair, reasoned and complete consideration of all relevant materials and the college&#039;s explanations. Where the record showed that the first inspection did not reveal substantial deficiencies and later observations from the Oversight Committee and DGHS diluted the alleged shortcomings, an order debarring admissions and directing encashment of the bank guarantee was found unsustainable for failure to afford a reasonable hearing. On the materials, the college had substantially addressed the alleged deficiencies, so the conditional letter of permission for the academic year 2017-18 was directed to be confirmed and admission permission continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1728 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313737</link>
      <description>A disapproval order under Section 10A(4) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 must rest on a fair, reasoned and complete consideration of all relevant materials and the college&#039;s explanations. Where the record showed that the first inspection did not reveal substantial deficiencies and later observations from the Oversight Committee and DGHS diluted the alleged shortcomings, an order debarring admissions and directing encashment of the bank guarantee was found unsustainable for failure to afford a reasonable hearing. On the materials, the college had substantially addressed the alleged deficiencies, so the conditional letter of permission for the academic year 2017-18 was directed to be confirmed and admission permission continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>