https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313738 A university was treated as an educational institution under Section 2(b) of the 1992 Act because the first limb of the definition covered institutions imparting education leading to degrees or diplomas conferred by a university established under State law, without any separate government notification. The notification requirement applied only to the residuary category. For medical and engineering courses, however, the special fee-fixation mechanism under Section 4(2-A) of the 1992 Act prevailed over the university's general fee-setting power under the 2013 Act, so fees had to be fixed by the statutory Committee on Fixation of Fee. Statutory estoppel could not override that mandate. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:26:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313738 A university was treated as an educational institution under Section 2(b) of the 1992 Act because the first limb of the definition covered institutions imparting education leading to degrees or diplomas conferred by a university established under State law, without any separate government notification. The notification requirement applied only to the residuary category. For medical and engineering courses, however, the special fee-fixation mechanism under Section 4(2-A) of the 1992 Act prevailed over the university's general fee-setting power under the 2013 Act, so fees had to be fixed by the statutory Committee on Fixation of Fee. Statutory estoppel could not override that mandate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313738