<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313740</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed appeals challenging property ownership claims by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The court held that burden lies on the party alleging joint family property to prove the property belongs to HUF, which was not established. Mere joint business operations do not create presumption of joint family property. The court applied estoppel principles, noting parties cannot take contradictory positions. Regarding leased lands, the court found no evidence that lease consideration was paid from HUF funds, rejecting claims that one party was minor when payments were made. The will executed by one party was declared null and void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 914 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313740</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed appeals challenging property ownership claims by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The court held that burden lies on the party alleging joint family property to prove the property belongs to HUF, which was not established. Mere joint business operations do not create presumption of joint family property. The court applied estoppel principles, noting parties cannot take contradictory positions. Regarding leased lands, the court found no evidence that lease consideration was paid from HUF funds, rejecting claims that one party was minor when payments were made. The will executed by one party was declared null and void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>