<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Corrects Penalty Rate Error: AO Imposed Higher Misreporting Penalty Instead of 50% Under-reporting Rate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76992</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed the penalty under the provision related to misreporting of income. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s action of invoking the higher penalty rate for misreporting was not justified. It was established that the penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income carried different rates under Section 270A of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty should have been restricted to the rate applicable for under-reporting of income, which is 50%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:49:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Corrects Penalty Rate Error: AO Imposed Higher Misreporting Penalty Instead of 50% Under-reporting Rate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76992</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed the penalty under the provision related to misreporting of income. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s action of invoking the higher penalty rate for misreporting was not justified. It was established that the penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income carried different rates under Section 270A of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty should have been restricted to the rate applicable for under-reporting of income, which is 50%.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:49:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>