https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313728 A person claiming an interest in suit property is not barred from seeking a receiver merely because he is not yet on record as a party. The power under Order 40 Rule 1 extends beyond existing parties and may be exercised to preserve property where competing claimants have no established present right to retain possession. On the facts, poor management, uncultivated property, and the risk of further deterioration justified appointment of a receiver over the joint family property. The appointment was upheld, while the choice of the individual receiver was left open for further determination. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:43:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313728 A person claiming an interest in suit property is not barred from seeking a receiver merely because he is not yet on record as a party. The power under Order 40 Rule 1 extends beyond existing parties and may be exercised to preserve property where competing claimants have no established present right to retain possession. On the facts, poor management, uncultivated property, and the risk of further deterioration justified appointment of a receiver over the joint family property. The appointment was upheld, while the choice of the individual receiver was left open for further determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313728