<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (2) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313727</link>
    <description>The HC exercised its discretion under Section 247 of the Succession Act to appoint an administrator pendente lite due to serious allegations against the executor and the necessity to manage the estate&#039;s assets during litigation. The Administrator General of Bengal was appointed, with an option for a consensual appointment before finalizing the order, ensuring impartiality and preventing further disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:39:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (2) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313727</link>
      <description>The HC exercised its discretion under Section 247 of the Succession Act to appoint an administrator pendente lite due to serious allegations against the executor and the necessity to manage the estate&#039;s assets during litigation. The Administrator General of Bengal was appointed, with an option for a consensual appointment before finalizing the order, ensuring impartiality and preventing further disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>