<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1026 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313725</link>
    <description>The HC resolved the probate dispute over conflicting Wills from 1985 and 1993 by appointing the applicant as Administrator pendente lite. The Court emphasized estate management without asset distribution, in line with section 247 of the Indian Succession Act. The Administrator is tasked with property development, preserving disputed flats until further orders. An expeditious hearing was granted to address the probate dispute swiftly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1026 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313725</link>
      <description>The HC resolved the probate dispute over conflicting Wills from 1985 and 1993 by appointing the applicant as Administrator pendente lite. The Court emphasized estate management without asset distribution, in line with section 247 of the Indian Succession Act. The Administrator is tasked with property development, preserving disputed flats until further orders. An expeditious hearing was granted to address the probate dispute swiftly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>