<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 370 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313724</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the HC, restoring the ex parte interim injunction and directing the Receiver to hand over possession of the suit shop to the plaintiff. The court recognized the plaintiff&#039;s lawful possession and forceful dispossession by defendant 1. A stay on the order&#039;s operation was granted for three weeks to enable respondents to seek further legal recourse. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 370 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313724</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the HC, restoring the ex parte interim injunction and directing the Receiver to hand over possession of the suit shop to the plaintiff. The court recognized the plaintiff&#039;s lawful possession and forceful dispossession by defendant 1. A stay on the order&#039;s operation was granted for three weeks to enable respondents to seek further legal recourse. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>