<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 727 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313723</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC upheld the revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, determining it lacked jurisdiction as the cause of action arose outside Calcutta. The balance of convenience favored Rajasthan, where key events occurred. The Court dismissed Gujarat NRE&#039;s suit, vacated the interim order, and ordered costs to HZL, while correcting an improper observation by the single Judge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 727 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313723</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC upheld the revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, determining it lacked jurisdiction as the cause of action arose outside Calcutta. The balance of convenience favored Rajasthan, where key events occurred. The Court dismissed Gujarat NRE&#039;s suit, vacated the interim order, and ordered costs to HZL, while correcting an improper observation by the single Judge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>