<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1924 (11) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</link>
    <description>A gathering of shareholders at a private house does not constitute a company meeting unless convened under the articles of association or other recognised legal authority. Because the alleged gathering was not a company meeting, it did not breach the injunction directed at company meetings. The basis for contempt and related criminal proceedings therefore failed, and the order directing those proceedings was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1924 (11) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</link>
      <description>A gathering of shareholders at a private house does not constitute a company meeting unless convened under the articles of association or other recognised legal authority. Because the alleged gathering was not a company meeting, it did not breach the injunction directed at company meetings. The basis for contempt and related criminal proceedings therefore failed, and the order directing those proceedings was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>