<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1924 (11) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC invalidated the appointment of a Receiver in a dispute within Arya Insurance Co. Ltd., citing procedural errors. The injunction from the Munsif&#039;s Court restraining a company meeting was deemed erroneous. The Court emphasized adherence to the Articles of Association for valid meetings and questioned its jurisdiction in appointing Receivers, highlighting irregularities in the proceedings. The Rule was made absolute, with the plaintiff bearing the costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1924 (11) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC invalidated the appointment of a Receiver in a dispute within Arya Insurance Co. Ltd., citing procedural errors. The injunction from the Munsif&#039;s Court restraining a company meeting was deemed erroneous. The Court emphasized adherence to the Articles of Association for valid meetings and questioned its jurisdiction in appointing Receivers, highlighting irregularities in the proceedings. The Rule was made absolute, with the plaintiff bearing the costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>