https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313721 The HC set aside the sale of the petitioners' share in the Pratapaditya Road property, declaring the terms of settlement invalid concerning their interests in other properties. The court ordered rectification of deeds and compliance with legal requirements, maintaining the petitioners' rights. Allegations of fraud in obtaining the consent order were upheld, and the application challenging it was deemed maintainable. The court also confirmed the petitioners' rights under the Indian Succession Act, dismissing the applicability of Section 26 of the Hindu Succession Act due to their conversion to Christianity. The sale was valid only for shares of consenting parties. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2024 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313721 The HC set aside the sale of the petitioners' share in the Pratapaditya Road property, declaring the terms of settlement invalid concerning their interests in other properties. The court ordered rectification of deeds and compliance with legal requirements, maintaining the petitioners' rights. Allegations of fraud in obtaining the consent order were upheld, and the application challenging it was deemed maintainable. The court also confirmed the petitioners' rights under the Indian Succession Act, dismissing the applicability of Section 26 of the Hindu Succession Act due to their conversion to Christianity. The sale was valid only for shares of consenting parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313721