https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313718 The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC's determination that the lands were ryoti and the respondent was a ryot under the Madras Estates Land Act. The lease was valid without the Hindu Religious Endowments Board's sanction. The Civil Court lacked jurisdiction, and the HC's dismissal of the cross-objection was set aside. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs throughout. en-us Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:31:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313718 The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC's determination that the lands were ryoti and the respondent was a ryot under the Madras Estates Land Act. The lease was valid without the Hindu Religious Endowments Board's sanction. The Civil Court lacked jurisdiction, and the HC's dismissal of the cross-objection was set aside. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs throughout. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313718