<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1943 (2) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313714</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the appellate court&#039;s decree and restored the trial court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the plaintiff. It determined that the khata of 1931 constituted a new contract, thus making the plaintiff&#039;s suit maintainable. The respondents were ordered to pay the appellant&#039;s costs throughout the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1943 (2) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313714</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the appellate court&#039;s decree and restored the trial court&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the plaintiff. It determined that the khata of 1931 constituted a new contract, thus making the plaintiff&#039;s suit maintainable. The respondents were ordered to pay the appellant&#039;s costs throughout the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>