<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (11) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313713</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the mortgage deed. The Ct. held that the deed was supported by consideration, despite the abatement of the previous suit. Allegations of fraud and misrepresentation were rejected due to insufficient evidence. The mortgage&#039;s attestation was deemed proper, and its integrity remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (11) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313713</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the mortgage deed. The Ct. held that the deed was supported by consideration, despite the abatement of the previous suit. Allegations of fraud and misrepresentation were rejected due to insufficient evidence. The mortgage&#039;s attestation was deemed proper, and its integrity remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>