https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313709 The HC concluded that the Will dated 16.5.1973 was validly executed and attested, while the codicil dated 21.5.1973 was not adequately proved. The court held that the same formalities for execution and proof apply to both Wills and codicils. Registration alone does not suffice as proof of execution and attestation. Consequently, the codicil could not modify the Will's dispositions. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:57:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313709 The HC concluded that the Will dated 16.5.1973 was validly executed and attested, while the codicil dated 21.5.1973 was not adequately proved. The court held that the same formalities for execution and proof apply to both Wills and codicils. Registration alone does not suffice as proof of execution and attestation. Consequently, the codicil could not modify the Will's dispositions. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313709