https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313706 A property description in a suit notice and plaint was held sufficient where the premises were identified as specific shop portions at a stated door number and had been occupied by the tenants for decades, so the objection of uncertainty failed under Order VII Rule 3 CPC. The Court also accepted that trustees could maintain eviction proceedings on behalf of a public charitable trust under Order XXXI Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and that a change in individual trustees did not affect the representative suit. On the facts, the trust's case for eviction for demolition and reconstruction of an old, dilapidated building was upheld, with the exemption for public charitable trusts under Section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act applied. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:00:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313706 A property description in a suit notice and plaint was held sufficient where the premises were identified as specific shop portions at a stated door number and had been occupied by the tenants for decades, so the objection of uncertainty failed under Order VII Rule 3 CPC. The Court also accepted that trustees could maintain eviction proceedings on behalf of a public charitable trust under Order XXXI Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and that a change in individual trustees did not affect the representative suit. On the facts, the trust's case for eviction for demolition and reconstruction of an old, dilapidated building was upheld, with the exemption for public charitable trusts under Section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act applied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313706