<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Corrects Typo, Rules in Favor of Appellant on iRET Import Duty Based on Actual Specifications.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76982</link>
    <description>Import of Internal Remote Electrical Tilt Switches (iRET) - benefit of Exemption notification - Whether the amperage of the iRETs imported by the appellant were of 5 Amps as declared in the Bills of Entry or were of less than 5 Amps as now asserted by the appellant relying on the aforesaid documents - The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, accepting the evidence presented to establish that the imported iRETs were actually of less than 5 amperes. The Tribunal highlighted a typographical error in the documentation and emphasized that duties should be charged based on the actual specifications of the imported goods. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Corrects Typo, Rules in Favor of Appellant on iRET Import Duty Based on Actual Specifications.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76982</link>
      <description>Import of Internal Remote Electrical Tilt Switches (iRET) - benefit of Exemption notification - Whether the amperage of the iRETs imported by the appellant were of 5 Amps as declared in the Bills of Entry or were of less than 5 Amps as now asserted by the appellant relying on the aforesaid documents - The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, accepting the evidence presented to establish that the imported iRETs were actually of less than 5 amperes. The Tribunal highlighted a typographical error in the documentation and emphasized that duties should be charged based on the actual specifications of the imported goods. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>