https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76973 The original appellant (now deceased) was represented by her son as her legal representative. The suit initially sought a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property, asserting her exclusive ownership and possession against the defendants, who are other family members. - Upon the death of the original appellant, her son sought to substitute himself as the appellant, claiming inheritance rights. - The Court noted the difference in scenarios where the plaintiff versus the defendant dies. While an injunction becomes moot if a defendant dies (since it cannot bind the heirs unless explicitly directed), the same does not apply when a plaintiff dies. - The High Court held that the cause of action for an injunction does not necessarily di..... en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:30:01 +0530 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:30:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76973 The original appellant (now deceased) was represented by her son as her legal representative. The suit initially sought a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property, asserting her exclusive ownership and possession against the defendants, who are other family members. - Upon the death of the original appellant, her son sought to substitute himself as the appellant, claiming inheritance rights. - The Court noted the difference in scenarios where the plaintiff versus the defendant dies. While an injunction becomes moot if a defendant dies (since it cannot bind the heirs unless explicitly directed), the same does not apply when a plaintiff dies. - The High Court held that the cause of action for an injunction does not necessarily di..... Highlights Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:30:01 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76973