<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1120 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751939</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the view that expenses cannot be recharacterised as capital expenditure merely because the assessee had no income chargeable under the income head relied on by the AO. Once business had commenced, the proposition that no expenses could be claimed under the deduction provisions was held unsustainable, and the challenge was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1120 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751939</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the view that expenses cannot be recharacterised as capital expenditure merely because the assessee had no income chargeable under the income head relied on by the AO. Once business had commenced, the proposition that no expenses could be claimed under the deduction provisions was held unsustainable, and the challenge was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>