<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1113 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty of Rs. 10,38,976 under sec. 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the interest income was duly disclosed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing that quantum additions do not automatically warrant penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1113 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ordering the deletion of the penalty of Rs. 10,38,976 under sec. 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2017-18. The Tribunal concluded that the interest income was duly disclosed, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing that quantum additions do not automatically warrant penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>