<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1108 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751927</link>
    <description>ITAT Rajkot held that excess stock found during survey and admitted as undisclosed business income by the main partner should be treated as business income, not unexplained investment under sections 69/69A/69B. The tribunal found that since the excess stock was mixed and not separately identifiable, and emerged from business operations, it should be presumed as business income. The AO&#039;s order treating it as business income was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1108 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751927</link>
      <description>ITAT Rajkot held that excess stock found during survey and admitted as undisclosed business income by the main partner should be treated as business income, not unexplained investment under sections 69/69A/69B. The tribunal found that since the excess stock was mixed and not separately identifiable, and emerged from business operations, it should be presumed as business income. The AO&#039;s order treating it as business income was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>